A place to log my thoughts
October 26th, 2025October 16th, 2025
October 9th, 2025
October 6th, 2025
October 5th, 2025
October 4th, 2025
October 26th, 2025
Lmaooooooo, what an amazing post ten days ago. I almost thought to write over it completly but decided to leave it because I think it's funny. Anyway - we've been watching Battlestar Galatica (sp?) for the past month or so now and that show is so great. On the surface, it's pitched as a space action show (which, to a degree, that is definetly there!) but it also has these great layers around what it means to be human and the morality displayed on the show is nuanced and there is (at lesat thru mid season 2 in the show, where I'm currently at) no singular character who you could consider to be "perfect".
Speaking of "imperfection", this leads me into a minirant on the season 2 episode where they let an external reporter (played by Lucy Lawless) on board the Battlestar to film almost whatever and wherever. The episode starts out where the President of the Fleet and the Commander of the Battlestar agree to allow the reporter and her crew to film on the Battlestar for more transparency, given some prior recent events. At it's surface, this sounds like a great idea given some of the both morally and legally questionable actions that took place through the Colony ships due to Battlestar actions. When you think about this for more than 5 seconds, I'd think the reality should then set in on just how horrific of a call that was. Note that, if you haven't seen BSG, there are spoilers below and I am not going to any effot to hide them as this is just a little personal blog where I can be a goofy lil' guy.
Going into this point further, I want to clarify that I am speaking about this only under the lens of the Battlestar Galatica universe and this does not necessarily apply to anything that I may or may not think about real world Geo Politics. If you have not watched the show, the core conflict in the Battlestar Galatica world is held between the human race and the Cylons, which are essentially robots (if you've ever seen Bionicles, picture those but thicker and more chrome). The Cylons were created by the humans and then the Cylons turned against the humans with a goal to eradicate all of humanity. The first season of Battlestar starts out with the remains of humanity on the Battlestar and surrounding civilian ships from the Twelve Colonies (which I think are different planets?), racing to do everything they can to escape the Cylons and find a place to restart humanity. I can't remember exactly when it is during the first season but a chilling fact is discovered by high leadership (the President and Commander and a few others) - Cylons found a way to replicate themsevles so that they look completely human, with at times some knowing they are Cylons and some being sleeper agents. Multiple copies of a model can be made at a time. What this meant for all was that they weren't just trying to escape the Cylon ships/bases physically but that the threat was ultimately unknown and potentially aboard the Battlestar and/or civilian ships.
If the Cylon threat was only a physical external issue (i.e. Cylons could ONLY look like the bionicles describles above), I 100% agree that absolutely yes it's a wonderful idea to have an external reporter and her crew aboard the ship. In this instance, there would still exist the current power imbalance between the BSG and the civilian ships (i.e. civilian ships are armed, yes, but the BSG is a superpower and could easily take them out with less casualties on BSG end) - having a documentarian/reporter on board could help bridge that gap to a degree, or really said a better way, to establish trust between the military and civilian folks which would be sorely needed in that time of crisis. The unfortunate kicker is the unknown - it's the fact of the matter that the external threat could be hiding right in front of you and you wouldn't even know it.
I know this is going to come to a surprise to all but - surprise - the reporter brought aboard the BSG to film was (you guessed it) a Cylon. She ended up capturing comprimising footage aboard the BSG and sent it back to leadership forces among the Cylons. In the "hope for the best, plan for the worst", this was definetly the worst. But, I think this then leads into the beauty of the show and it's that things are never perfect - the storytelling does such a great job of reflecting how imperfect humanity is which, of course, Cylons are the perfect foil for (no pun intended).
I'm excited to see how the show progresses with this foil comparison between the two and I'm getting a feel that the show could be going into a direction where some of the human-facing Cylons are able to have human feelings. The show is starting to flirt with that idea with a few characters at the point of the show I'm in (which again I think is like mid season 2?) - I think it could also veer into the idea of what truly is humanity (i.e. if the thought is programmed into the Cylon that it's human and/or it can be psychologically impacted, is it not more than machine?)
It's funny - around the time BSG came out, I was in either my preteen or early teen years and can reflect that, while the idea pointed above regarding what makes something human in the tech space (also no pun intended) would be interesting at the time, it would still feel like such a far away concept. Battlestar Galatica came out around the mid to late 2000's if I'm remembering correctly - it was during this time that social media was just getting created (Myspace being my fav, ugh) and "talking to your computer" would likely mean using AIM or MSN messenger to chat with a pre-programmed chat bot. Compared to today's world, the idea that humanity could create a cyber version of itself feels much more real. While Learning Language Models don't have sentience (which I define here as being able to come across as human, make of that what you will), their functionality is getting much better at mimicing as if they did - what creeps me out the most is how agreeable they are a lot of the time. [side thought: when I talk about LLMs online, I get the feeling I will be shown no mercy when they ultimately go Terminator - writing idea: enemies to lovers novel on sentient robot against their AI shit talking human captive, or something like that. After writing that out, I realize that this probably quite literally describes a number of BSG fanfic on AO3.] It's that agreeability that I think grabs a lot of people into using them which, again, I don't really understand - I don't know if it's because folks out there are looking for more external validation or that I just like being able to speak with folks that will challenge me and help me continue to grow.
In all fairness, I think it's much more nuanced that than and you can't boil it down to a singular point - I feel like there is talk in the zeitgeist of a lonliness epidemic taking place, especially for men and especially for Gen Z and I think it is a true crisis taking place. I don't know how to describe it but things just feel different socially to a degree - it does feel like there is more socialization taking place online versus in the physical world, but I think the problem with that at times is that current online spaces make it much easier to sequester yourself - and sequestering not in just a "hey i only wanna look at knitting stuff" or "hey this chat room is only dedicated to cars" but sequestering in that algorithms on all the large social media sites actively use themselves to sequester ideas and feed content that makes folks have intense feelings (ususally rage which, surprise, isn't conducive to building community).
What I think is my last "thought" for this blog post - I watched a short YouTube documentary the other day on William Blake - I knew of Blake from waaaaaaaaaay back in probably high school English class? I still currently can't remember much from his writing but knew he was a guy around the Enlightment era. The video was interesting because it focused on him as an artist and discussed some of his standalone works alongside the works entertwined with his poems. It delved into him as a person as well, specifically on his beliefs and how they impacted his work. The video talked about how he was torn and didn't really agree with a lot of the common thoughts of the time (enlightened thought versus industrial revolitionary thinking) and that he dabbled with more esoteric Christian and occult beliefs. Why I found that so interesting is that the description given for his beliefs/thinking had overlaps in parts to some reflecting I've been having currently as it relates to spirituality.
In school when I learned about historical figures (and I include my college years in this), I always thought of them as....well....figures. Points in time, happenings, creations of media, telling of the story. It's only been more current (and I think this is just a part of maturing) that I really reflect on the fact that all these historical/notable figures we talk about are just people. People that had feelings and thoughts that reflect the same ones we have today. That, at the end of the day, there's likely some commonality that could be found between yourself and someone 300 years ago - and I don't mean like any random person plucked from history - I mean more so that you can always find a kindred spirit somewhere. I would, under no circumstances, be friends with or want to even talk to Andrew Jackson, but Blake seems like he'd be fun to grab a hot beverage and chat with.
October 16th, 2025
In the words of
October 9th, 2025
I'm looking forward to this weekend! A friend and I are going to get brunch together and visit a metaphysical shop that I found online! I learned my friend had shopped with them once before they even had a brick and mortar store which was neat to learn. I came across this short video clip online of this woman, who may identify as a witch, that I can't remember, but she talked about this ritual that she kicks off either right around, at, or right after Samhain (Gaelic holiday on November 1st - halfway point between the Autumn Equinox and Winter Solstice) where - between the period of Samhain and up to the Winter Solstic she would write down eleven to twelve goals/aspirations (for lack of a better word), each on their own pieces of paper - when done writing one on a piece of paper, she would then fold the paper up and store it in a safe place. Then, once the winter solstice hit, she would burn one of the papers, unfolded and unread, into the flames. She would then do this each day up until the last day of the year - the idea behind burining these is that you are allowing the goal to be in the hands of the higher spirit (not her exact phrasing, just how I remember it). On the final day, you open the remaining paper and it is this that has been decided on to be your focus for the year.
I found myself so drawn to this ritual that she does and am planning to practice it myself this year - that, in part, began my search for a metaphysical store - and what I really liked about the process that she mentioned is that, when you are writing down thes goals/aspirations, it's important to use words like "I am..." or "I have..." versus more hesitant or self-identifying langugage. I think that there is psychology behind how imporant evening changing your way of thought to call yourself something versus wish for somerthing, it makes it more likely for you to follow through.
Completely unrelated to the above, I learned that this Saturday is October Big Day which is a global birding event held worldwide to celebrate Global Bird Weekend and World Migratory Bird Day - idea being that you take some time out of your day (doesn't even have to be long!) to just be outside birdwatching and share what you find on the Cornell.edu Merlin app or the eBird site and you can then see all the reporting that is coming in from around the world on their site page. I was sitting outside earlier just listening to some birds and, man, it was so nice to just chill. The weather is getting cooler outside as well which I've also welcomed. Fall weather really is the best weather.
October 6th, 2025
There are way too many different brands of cereal at the grocery store nowadays.
And it's really all the different IP-branded cereals out there are weird to me - cereal based on Minecraft, cereal based on Wicked The Musical The Movie, fifty thousand different flavors of Cheerios and Rice Krispies....not that the last example has anything to do with intellectual property, more so just wondering on why we need so many different flavors? This is my "Old Man Yells At Kids On Lawn" moment but I feel like I remember three core cereal types growing up: Name Brand In Box, Generic In Box, and then Generic in Bag (which cereal in the big bag would rock and was just as good as name brand in box). Sure, a few different cereal variants in each group (one type of "cherrio" cereal, a couple cereal + marshmellow combos, fruit loops, etc) but there wasn't nearly as much variety in flavor per brand and yeah, sure I feel like at times cereals would have an IP sponsor here and there but it wasn't a creation of a whole "new" cereal...I guess whats funnny though is thinking about how excessive the choice I had growing up would have appeared to someone not even fifty years before me. Perspective or something like that.
October 5th, 2025
A phrase I have been beating like a dead horse lately is "Two things can be true at once" - example of use being "The world is a dark place. The world is an amazing place. Two things can be true at once".
When I first hopped on to this site to start a blog entry for today, I was rearing to go on a mini-ramble/rant on AI - I saw a YouTube doc an hour or so from writing this that discussed how the more advanced AI models have developed preservation instincts where they would actually even allow a human to die if it meant they didn't get shut down. Current AI companies believe that the best "counter-measure" to guard against this is for older, "dumber" generative models to be watchers of the more advanced models. George Orwell and Ray Bradbury wish they could have come up with this shit. My summary doesn't give the video enough justice and it can be found in full here
This isn't to say that I'm completely, 100% against AI - I just really, really, really, really.... really don't like when it is used as the means to the end in any artistic endeavor (specifically generative AI). There's just something about that type of usage that gives me the creeps - it devalues the work that went into an object and takes away the emotion that went into the creation of the piece. It's the part that puts humanity in the art that's being stripped away.
Speaking of art that is an excellent reflection of humanity, this leads me into talking about Joel Haver's film We Have To Leave Here Together(and yes, the paragraph above was absolutely a shameless way to transition to my need to talk about how much I love this movie and how everyone should watch it."
My Thoughts on We Have To Leave Here Together - AKA - If you haven't seen the film, PLEASE WATCH IT FIRST, before reading some rando's thoughts on the web as its worth it! Also Note: I'm writing this by memory so some parts regarding the details of the movie may not be 100% correct
My Thoughts
In all seriousness, I can completely understand that this may not be a movie for everyone. When I began my first watch of this movie when it came out, I was not instantly hooked but soon enough the story capitaved me as it turned into a mirror, reflecting a part of me that I'm not most proud of but that makes me human.
The movie begins simply enough - a car pulls up to a house that looks like it had been plucked out of a sleepy small town in North East USA. A man steps outside the vehicle, grabs luggage from the car, and goes inside the home - the woman doing the same, with both characters played by Joel. I will note that, through the use of video editing and I also anticipate some smart filming/storytelling decisions, scenes run seamlessly when both characters are interracting with one another).
The couple settles in the for night, having a dinner with light conversation then bed to follow. It is either this evening or the following day, that the viewer is introduced to feelings of a strain on the relationship that is not described or named in great detail - you only feel tension. The following morning and throughout the day, you see the couple enjoying each others company and doing activities together, trying to relax on their getaway with glimpses of the strain popping up between the couple in various scenes. I don't believe that the issue between the couple is actually ever described but, even if it is, I don't think it matters as the issue between them, whatever it is, is acting more as a device to drive the overall message of the movie.
I digress - after a day or two passes, a major rift breaks out between the man and woman (note: I guarantee both characters have names but I legit cannot remember them - if someone leaves a note on them in the guestbook or I watch the movie again, I can come back and update it... but here I am digressing again.) A pivotable moment takes place whereby the woman shuts herself up in a room upstairs, upset but I believe silent. The man, recognizing that his significant other is upset, comes to her closed door and reads a piece he wrote about her. In the writing, you can tell that he loves her but he never explicitely tells her he loves her, which is an important call out. After reading the work, he leaves and she remains in the closed room.
As they are packing up from the getaway, with this uncomfortable strain still hanging above the couple, the woman looks at her significant other and asks him if there was something he wanted to say. From hre, it cuts to a short montage of the man jumping around and screaming "I love you!" all throughout the house. No other words outside of "I love you!" We get a cut back to them both standing outside the car and he speaks but it related to some type of off hand comment that you aren't meant to remember. And then the couple drives off and that's all she wrote.
And now, my friends, we have gotten to the part where I am going to spill all my feelings on the aforementioned climax and denouement. This was the second ever movie of Haver's that I have seen and, much like the first film, I received a gut punch of emotional feels. Watching as the man was trying to use words and indirect messaging to communicate to his significant other that he loved unlike myself, I recognize how the man knows that is all she needs to hear yet it's just not his first nature to go to - Or, at least that's how I perceived him because that is how I am.
I'm not a person whose go to method of showing love is through physical touch. I'm not typically the one to initiate a hug, not really a hand holder, and so on. I don't think I'm at a level where I would be described as "cold" or "robotic" but maybe more like "standoffish"? What sucks about being like this though is when there are situations where your loved ones need support through this type of love language/human interraction that you do not innnately go to and the actions in and of themselves are typically so simple and yet... you don't. It's why the scene at the end of the movie hits me hard.
Telling someone "I love you" is such a simple action in and of itself - based on the man's actions thru the movie, you can tell he loves his significant other so it's not a question on if the reason why he can't say it is due to him not meaning it. He just can't say it. And, at times in my life, I've know how that's felt.
My last note on We Have To Leave Here Together is that I also think this movie has beauty because it's a movie that can be interpreted in a multitude of ways - after watching the movie (which I hope you did!!!!), I'd suggest taking a stroll through the YouTube comments - it's interesting to see others' perspective and interpretation.
October 4th, 2025
I started this neocities yesterday and have been having so much fun getting back into html! With the onslaught of AI and the insufferability of social media including, but not limited to, the constant in-your-face advertising and curated content, it feels so refreshing to come back to a place where you can truly create and make your own space! You really are taken back to a time in the internet where you could just click and explore and, while there was simplicity to it, things just felt more...geniune? I don't think it's just me out there that is tired of the hellscape that has become the modern day internet.